BitLicense Architect Ben Lawsky Joins Ripple Board - CoinDesk

Ben Lawsky: Bitcoin Regulation 'Will Separate The Wheat From The Chaff'

Ben Lawsky: Bitcoin Regulation 'Will Separate The Wheat From The Chaff' submitted by kkoolook to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Ben Lawsky: Bitcoin Regulation 'Will Separate The Wheat From The Chaff'

Ben Lawsky: Bitcoin Regulation 'Will Separate The Wheat From The Chaff' submitted by BTCNews to BTCNews [link] [comments]

Ben Lawsky CoinDesk Interview (Full Text)

CoinDesk: New York extended the comment period for its BitLicense proposal. What were the key factors behind the decision?
Lawsky: We got a request from a number of different companies and individuals, including a large number of companies and individuals that sent a letter together, and certainly when we get a request from people who care deeply about how this regulation turns out, that's a factor, we consider that request and we consider it seriously.
In terms of why we did it, we got the request, but I think it's obvious that we're regulating here in a new area where you really have this very fascinating and complicated collision of regulation and technology, and I think it's vital we get it right.
It's clear from the letters we received and the letters we've gotten, there's a chance that this regulation could be a template that could be used not only in the US but internationally, and I think that gives us an additional responsibility to do our very best to get it right and the best way to get something right is to try and get as many viewpoints as you can when you put a complicated regulatory framework, consider them carefully and make the best decisions possible.
We want to make sure we consider all the potential unintended consequences, we want to make sure we're considering all the intentional consequences and the more we do that, the better the reg is ultimately going to be.
Now, we do want to move relatively quickly still, I think the sooner we get the regulatory framework out there, I think ultimately the better, but we don't need to move so fast that we risk getting something wrong.
I think given the level of interest, given that this is a new area and it's complicated and that it's potentially an international template and given the request for more time, I think an additional 45 days was reasonable. I look forward to getting a lot more comments.
We're not the kind of agency that thinks we have a monopoly on the truth and that we're always right. We feel strongly about a lot of the provisions in the proposed reg, but we get it that there might be things we can improve. The more comments that we get from serious people who care deeply about the future of digital currencies, then i think we're going to take those comments very seriously and we're already working on them in terms of a new revised reg we would put out at the end of October.
CoinDesk: There's been a lot of negative reactions to the proposal, have you been surprised by the community's reaction?
No, not really. I think the most surprising thing has been that certain provisions in the regulation that I think when we drafted it initially that we thought would be pretty clear in terms of the breadth, were read by some much more broadly than we intended.
The reg is intended primarily to financial intermediaries and to the financial service industry. What we saw fairly quickly that certain provisions were being read by software developers as potentially applying to them, and that could have a stifling development on them, if every time you needed to develop a new piece of code, you'd have to go get a license, when we read the reg we were pretty clear that it wouldn't apply to software developers, so we were a little surprised it was read that way, but looking back I can see how if there's a potential that the reg applies to you and you're talking to your lawyers and you don't know, these words are ambiguous, that's something that can occur.
I think accompanying the revisions, we'll do some kind of guidance so people have more clarity as to the breadth of the regs, so software developers aren't going to have to be sitting around wondering if it applies to them - it doesn't, it applies to financial intermediaries.
CoinDesk: You mentioned that you're currently revising the proposal. Can you take us through that process and the work that's being done?
Lawksy: I don't want to get too deep into it. But I think we have a whole group of people lawyers and otherwise, regulators who are going through all the comments we are receiving and putting them into buckets.
Let's say we have six letters we're looking at at one time, there might be the same point made in all six, and you just kind of bucket that and ultimately you have buckets of all the comments and critiques, etc and we go through a process of doing memos and analyses, do those comments make sense, should we make a change, should we not. Some of them might be obvious, like oh we didn't mean that, we didnt' need to say that.
I think some of them we'll have a lot of high-level meetings on, to talk through, well if we make that change, what does it mean, does it have any potentially unintended consequences, does this make the playing field somehow uneven for example and we'll work through that process and we'll put out a revised reg at the end of October. And when we put out a revised reg, if there are material changes, there's an additional 30-day comment period, so they can look at it and say this is a new revised reg, we should tinker here and tinker there
CoinDesk: Do foresee circumstances where you'd need to extend the time window for comment?
I don't right now, but never say never.
We do want to keep this moving on a fairly rapid track, we've already gotten extensive and very good comments in the first 45 days haven't even run fully. So I think an additional 45 days should get us to where we're comfortable and that we've given people enough time to think about the reg and the provisions they care about and give us comment and they have an additional 45 days, if they make changes, we'll get an additional 30 days then, so i feel like that should be more than enough time.
My hope is that we can move fairly rapidly.
CoinDesk: It's the end of October, what's the best-case outlook for bitcoin companies in New York?
We're primarily focused on the reg and getting it right and realizing that were not this agency that thinks it has a monopoly on the truth and if people have smart, good, thoughtful comment and we're going to consider them very carefully, and we're going to try to make this reg as thoughtful and nuanced and balanced and effective as we can.
If we get that right, I think the outlook for virtual currencies in one form or another is quite bright in New York, but we'll have to take it one day at a time.
http://www.coindesk.com/ben-lawsky-bitcoin-regulation/
submitted by thepete_rizzo_ to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Ben Lawsky, NY Regulator working on Bitcoin agrees to do an AMA

Ben Lawsky, NY Regulator working on Bitcoin agrees to do an AMA submitted by hereC to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Ben Lawsky on NYDFS Bitcoin Regulations...

Ben Lawsky on NYDFS Bitcoin Regulations... submitted by escapevelo to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Direct link: Petition to Ben Lawsky of NY "The World is Watching, please limit regulation on Bitcoin" (Please sign)

Direct link: Petition to Ben Lawsky of NY submitted by bruce_fenton to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

"Scum of the earth Ben Lawsky Is Now Officially a Bitcoin Backer; Helping Companies Navigate Regulations He Created"

submitted by finalhedge to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Forex news: BTC/USD: Ben Lawsky AMA on bitcoin regulation

Forex news: BTC/USD: Ben Lawsky AMA on bitcoin regulation submitted by jacknocks to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Bitcoin Regulation Ben Lawsky,New York: Is the time schedule (End Q II) still valid?

or any changes?
submitted by tami141 to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Nick Owens calls Ben Lawsky a "thoughtful regulator" who wants Bitcoin regs which are not excessive & focused on consumer protection

Nick Owens calls Ben Lawsky a submitted by bruce_fenton to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Ben Lawsky's proposed Bitcoin regulations are more inane than anyone could have thought

submitted by UsesMemesAtWrongTime to Bitcoin_Ancap [link] [comments]

Ben Lawsky from NYDFS posts the proposed BitLicense regulations - r/Bitcoin

Ben Lawsky from NYDFS posts the proposed BitLicense regulations - Bitcoin submitted by ThatchNailer to Rad_Decentralization [link] [comments]

B1bl3 NEWS:Ben Lawsky: New York Can’t Risk Getting Bitcoin Regulation Wrong,FireEye Founder: Bitcoin Could Secure Our Global Payments Infrastructure,BITCOIN NEWS ROUNDUP – AUGUST 22ND, 2014 and more

B1bl3 NEWS:Ben Lawsky: New York Can’t Risk Getting Bitcoin Regulation Wrong,FireEye Founder: Bitcoin Could Secure Our Global Payments Infrastructure,BITCOIN NEWS ROUNDUP – AUGUST 22ND, 2014 and more submitted by b1bl3 to CryptoCurrency [link] [comments]

Ben Lawsky: New York Can't Risk Getting Bitcoin Regulation Wrong

Ben Lawsky: New York Can't Risk Getting Bitcoin Regulation Wrong submitted by chalbersma to BitcoinNews [link] [comments]

"Scum of the earth Ben Lawsky Is Now Officially a Bitcoin Backer; Helping Companies Navigate Regulations He Created"

submitted by BitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

Ben Lawsky: New York Can’t Risk Getting Bitcoin Regulation Wrong

Ben Lawsky: New York Can’t Risk Getting Bitcoin Regulation Wrong submitted by MuchBitcoin to MuchBitcoin [link] [comments]

Hi, this is Ben Lawsky at NYDFS. Here are the proposed BitLicense regulations. : Bitcoin

submitted by themusicgod1 to ripplers [link] [comments]

X-Post /r/Bitcoin - "Hi, this is Ben Lawsky at NYDFS. Here are the proposed BitLicense regulations."

X-Post /Bitcoin - submitted by rob-ot to moneylaundering [link] [comments]

r/Bitcoin: Hi, this is Ben Lawsky at NYDFS. Here are the proposed BitLicense regulations. by /u/BenLawsky (37 mins. old)

submitted by rising_threads_bot to RisingThreads [link] [comments]

BitcoinOwl Covers Open Letter to Mr. Ben Lawsky of New York on Bitcoin Regulation

BitcoinOwl Covers Open Letter to Mr. Ben Lawsky of New York on Bitcoin Regulation submitted by bruce_fenton to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Hi, this is Ben Lawsky at NYDFS. Here are the proposed BitLicense regulations. : Bitcoin

Hi, this is Ben Lawsky at NYDFS. Here are the proposed BitLicense regulations. : Bitcoin submitted by seagray to seagray [link] [comments]

Ben Lawsky: New York Can’t Risk Getting Bitcoin Regulation Wrong

Ben Lawsky: New York Can’t Risk Getting Bitcoin Regulation Wrong submitted by BTCNews to BTCNews [link] [comments]

Future Money Regulation's with NYS top financial regulator Bejamin M. Lawsky BitLicense Will Publish End of October, NYDFS Ben Lawsky Will Keynote Money2020 Early November Ben Lawsky releases BitLicense at the BITS Emerging Payments Forum (full video) Bitcoin and the NY Bitlicence proposed regulations Chicago N. America Bitcoin Conference - Philanthropy, Emerging Markets & Regulation

Earlier today, New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) superintendent Ben Lawsky participated in a Bitcoin-themed Ask Me Anything (AMA) on Reddit, offering a window into the state’s plans for future regulation of the cryptocurrency.Lawsky made headlines last week after sketching out a regulatory framework that would include a “BitLicense” for those doing business in virtual ... Ben Lawsky Introduces Changes to the Bitcoin Bitlicense Regulations at Money 20/20 in Response to feedback from 90 Day Comment Period on Initial Proposal Ben Lawsky zealously followed and supported Bitcoin regulation in New York, even when the Bitcoin community spoke out in opposition. Furthermore, since his new firm provides consultancy on virtual currency in regulations in New York, the natural question is: did Lawsky use his position in the NYDFS to set himself up for private sector success? Hochstein probed Lawsky for a reaction to the ... Ben Lawsky, the former New York Superintendent of Financial Services who spearheaded the BitLicense regulatory framework while in office, has joined startup Ripple's board of directors. Financial regulation is a been a central topic for Bitcoins and other digital currencies. The lack of framework regulating Bitcoins has created a major difficulty for businesses active in the space. For exchanges, this has meant that forming banking partnerships for receiving and sending customer funds is filled with question marks, with no guarantees […]

[index] [12015] [35816] [45448] [11557] [30538] [15813] [11939] [41971] [35802] [164]

Future Money Regulation's with NYS top financial regulator Bejamin M. Lawsky

Let’s say you want to start a Bitcoin company in the U.S., chances are you’re going to need a Money Transmitter License, or rather 51 of them, because 47 sta... Ben Lawsky of the New York Department of Financial Services NYDFS has proposed some very onerous and extreme regulations surrounding Bitcoin which amount to essentially a ban on ideas, technology ... Pragmatism not Idealism - #LIVE CALL-IN - Bitcoin News Talk Chat Show - March 18, 2020 - Duration: 2:28:09. World Crypto Network 458 views. New BitLicense Will Publish At The End of October And NYDFS Superintendent Ben Lawsky Will Keynote Money20/20 Early November [UPDATE] If everything goes as scheduled. Hard Wallets: Get A Ledger Hard Wallet For Safe Digital Asset Storage Ledger Nano Link: https://bit.ly/2pTzCyV _____...

#